What’s your Sun Sign?
January 1, 2013 11 Comments
When somebody asks me what star-sign, or sun-sign, or moon-sign I am, a sort of embarrassed grin shows on my face. I am sorry, I could just easily say I’m a Virgo, but something in me stops me from saying that. Then as a few moments pass, I usually stumble for an answer but none comes out.
The problem I face is that whatever I tell others about me should at least be consistent with what I myself consider to be true and of any relevance whatsoever. But when a question like what Astro Sign I am comes up, it puts me into a dilemma.
Firstly, some people in an ancient civilization thousands of years ago came up with this idea that you are somehow governed by the position of certain celestial bodies (like the sun or the moon) in space at the time of your birth. Not only that, they even place you in the same “group” as others who were also born in the same “time period” even though in different years. The thought of belonging to a “group” based on what constellation was being seen at the time of birth sounds as ridiculous to me as belonging to a group based on the color of the walls of the delivery room. Extremely useless, isn’t it?
Similarly, another supposition that a constellation has an effect on a person simply by virtue of it being a recognizable shape in the sky is quite unreasonable. What about groups of stars that don’t form a recognizable shape? Does the non-appearance of a figure make the other stars impotent? What about the asteroids right in the middle of our own solar system? Don’t they get a say on my life? What about Neptune and Pluto? I love Pluto and I want Pluto to have a role too. But no one would listen to me. I know, I know what you will say about this. Wishful thinking on my part, isn’t it?
Anyway, ever since I was a kid, I have been told time and again that I am a Virgo. Well, my birth date falls on 29th August and matches with the date range for Virgo (23rd Aug – 22nd Sep), so I am Virgo. And whatever people said about my personal attributes based on my “sign” was, again, based on the description for Virgo.
But a few years ago, while studying astronomy as a hobby, I discovered that the charts published in newspapers, magazines, astrology books and everywhere else were all WRONG. They were all based on the noted positions of the sun relative to the 12 constellations more than 2000 years ago. I found out, as a matter of fact, that these relative positions have changed over a period of time due to the wobbling of the earth around its axis – also called precession. So, as of the new charts, my actual sign turned out to be…. LEO!! (Aug 10 to Sept 16). Look it up here.
Well, I was hurt. I sort of started believing I am a Virgo and it did seem like the most beautiful sign of all 12. Especially when they said that Virgos can be “tough on the outside but soft on the inside” and that “we care a lot about those we love and sometimes really hate the people we hate,” I know they struck a chord with me. And I am not the only one. Others were angry too.
But, now that I know I am not a Virgo anymore, I can’t continue to lie to and deceive people I interact with. Add to that the fact that there are 13 – and not 12 – zodiacal constellations (Ophiuchus – Nov 29 to Dec 17 so boo to those affected by this), the whole thing makes even lesser sense to me now than it did before. Damn that bloody astronomy that changed my view and took away the cosy comforts that astrology provided me when it told me I was part of a group who acted in exactly the same way as I did and that everything happening in my life was pre-determined and so I was not responsible for my failures. And even though the scales fell from my eyes long ago, this exposed piece of error on part of the astrologers even killed whatever little fun I had reading newspaper horoscopes.
So, when somebody asks me what Sign I am, I can either tell them that I am still a Virgo, in which case I would be lying, or I can tell them that I am a Leo, in which case it will not adhere to the prevailing, albeit incorrect system, thus making even this piece of information utterly useless. Compounded by the fact that even knowing a correct Sign really amounts to nothing, I am usually unable to answer at all. But then, one realizes that delving into such an explanation for such a trivial question might not always be the smartest thing to do. So, one quietly answers “Virgo” with the hope the Bozos asking this might climb down our backs. Unless I was Ophiuchus.
The proper response to the, what’s your sign, question is: the 70’s are over.
Astrologers claim that planets have electromagnetic influence on us at birth time. When I think about it aided with my physics background it sure makes me laugh at their ignorance. First, why only at the moment of birth? Why not while you are still forming in the womb? Second, even if I am to believe your nonsense, I know that planets are massive but I also know they are so far away to have any significant influence upon me. On the contrary, the FM radio of the nearest radio set has much more electromagnetic influence on me than your distant planet thus if you insist to label me with a sign, call me with that radio frequency name (radio rock?), and not Virgo or Aquarius 🙂
Mike.. There is no end to what astrologers claim.
Agree, the mother of ignorance is always pregnant. And as Einstein once said:
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe
I loved this quote “mother of ignorance is always pregnant” and have heard it for the first time but very very true. Thanks!
The comment by Mike was Hilarious, and made me ask more, Why just the moment of Birth, Why no when the father’s Sperm met with the Mother’s Egg? That is the real process of starting one life right? Just makes me laugh.
Its all Barnum Effect.
Using your post to put out my ideas, and consider my Post as a comment to this Blog.
THank you.
Agreed, but then again these questions have been asked so many times without any answers from the astrologers that it is sort of useless to ask them again. But nevertheless, the information must keep flowing and the question continue to be asked. I would also say that astrologers should also be open for scientific testing of their methods which is something almost all of them absolutely refuse to do. But when it is time to make astrology sound like science, they will refer to all kinds of scientific principles in order to make hocus pocus sound like science. I wonder why the entire scientific community absolutely dismisses astrology, alchemy and other such superstitious phenomenon so openly.
Here is a link to my post on Astrology.
http://mindofatul.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/astrology-is-not-mumbo-jumbo-or-is-it/
Also as you said, we wanting it to be put to test, check out Richard Dawkins : Enemies of Reason Part 2. There he asks an astrologer if its true, then why not do an experiment, and that person says No. Its not to be put to test, and then he asks how does it work, and the astrologer says I dont know. But i know it works. WHich i find is very silly.
Here is the Video Link : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlMiKrwCRQ0
Yes, I’ve seen that documentary. I find it quite disturbing that people are not willing to introspect even a little.
Pingback: Astrology Is NOT Mumbo Jumbo, Or is it? | From the Mind of AtulBhatS